Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): Journal of Leadership and Management

Organzational Slack and the Productive Opportunity of Growing Technology Firms

Christopher P. Neck
Department of Management, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Published December 23, 2014
How to Cite
Neck, H. M., & Neck, C. P. (2014). Organzational Slack and the Productive Opportunity of Growing Technology Firms. Journal of Leadership and Management, 2(2). Retrieved from http://leadership.net.pl/JLM/article/view/33


This research focuses on the growth of entrepreneurial firms, specifically young, high technology IPO firms.  We seek to empirically support Edith Penrose’s (1959) theory that the growth of the firm is a function of its changing productive opportunity. Understanding the factors that can expand the productive opportunity of the firm will enhance our understanding of firm growth. We posit that organizational slack is
a change agent that will affect the relationship between the productive opportunity of a firm and its subsequent growth. Findings show support for the hypothesized moderating role of slack in the productive opportunity to firm growth relationship; however, the moderating effect is consistently negative.


  1. Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  2. Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Publications.
  3. Anderson, S. C., Beard, R. T., and Born, J. A. (1995). Initial public offerings: Findings and theories. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Arbaugh, J. B. and Camp, M. S. (2000). Managing growth transitions: Theoretical perspectives and research directions. In D. L. Sexton and H. Landstrom (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship: 308-328. Oxford: Blackwell.
  5. Arkebauer, J. B. and Schultz, R. (1991). Cashing out: The entrepreneur’s guide to going public. New York: Harper Business.
  6. Beatty, R. P., and Zajac, E. J. (1994). Managerial incentives, monitoring and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 93 (2): 313-335.
  7. Beinhocker, E. D. (1999). Robust adaptive strategies. Sloan Management Review 4 (3): 95-106.
  8. Biggadike, R. E. (1976). Corporate diversification: Entry, strategy, and performance. Division of Research, Boston, MA: Harvard University.
  9. Block, Z. and MacMillan, I. (1993). Corporate venturing: Creating new business within the firm. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  10. Bolland, E. J., and Hofer, C. W. (1998). Future firms: How America’s high technology companies work. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Bourgeois, L. J. I. (1981). On the Measurement of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review, 6 (1): 29-39.
  12. Bourgeois, L., and Singh, J. V. (1983). Organizational slack and political behavior among top management teams. Academy of Management Proceedings 6 (1): 43-47.
  13. Bowman, E. H. and Hurry, D. (1993). Strategy through the options lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice processes. Academy of Management Review 18 (4): 760-782.
  14. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  15. Burgelman, R. A., Maidique, M. A., and Wheelwright, S. C. (2001). Strategic management of technology and innovation. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  16. Canals, J. (2000). Managing corporate growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F. H., Boulton, W. R., and Carland, J. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 9: 354-359.
  18. Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal 7: 437-458.
  19. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  20. Chaparro, F. (2012). Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, in Bogota, Colombia, on 18-19 October 2011 Reading: Academic Conferences Publishing International.
  21. Clayton, J., Gambill, B., and Harned, D. (1999). The curse of too much capital: Building new businesses in large corporations. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4: 48-59.
  22. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  23. Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P. (1997). High growth transitions: Theoretical perspectives and suggested directions. In D. L. Sexton and R. W. Smilor (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000: 99-126. Chicago: Upstart.
  24. Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., and Covin, T. J. (1990). Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: A comparison of small firms in high- and low-technology industries. Journal of Business Venturing 5: 391-412.
  25. Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  26. Cyr, L. A. (1998). Vulture capitalists or virtue capitalists? Examining the effects of venture capitalist involvement on the use of equity incentives and firm performance in initial public offering firms. Unpublished Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  27. Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13(4): 675-688.
  28. Davidsson, P. (1991). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 405-429.
  29. Dixit, A. K., and Pindyck, R. S. (1995). The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, 73(3): 105-115.
  30. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3: 179-202.
  31. Eisenhardt, K. M., and Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (3): 504-529.
  32. Evans, J. (1991). Strategic flexibility for high-technology maneuvers: A conceptual framework. Journal of Managerial Studies 28: 67-89.
  33. Filley, A. C. and Aldag, R. J. (1980). Organizational growth and types: Lessons from small institutions. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 2: 279-320. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  34. Fox, I. and Marcus, A. (1992). The causes and consequences of leveraged buyouts. Academy of Management Review 17 (1): 62-85.
  35. Greenley, G. E., and Oktemgil, M. (1998). A comparison of slack resources in high and low performing British companies. Journal of Management Studies 35 (3): 377-398.
  36. Hambrick, D. C. and Crozier, L. M. (1985). Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth. Journal of Business Venturing 1: 31-45.
  37. Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  38. Hambrick, D. C. and Snow, C. C. (1977). A contextual model of strategic decision making in organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings: 109-112.
  39. Hoy, F., McDougall, P. P., and Dsouza, D. E. (1992). Strategies and environments of high-growth firms. In D. L. Sexton and J. D. Kasarda (Eds.), State of the Art of Entrepreneurship (pp. 341-357). Boston: PWS-Kent.
  40. Jarrillo, J. C. (1989). Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources. Journal of Business Venturing 4: 133-147.
  41. Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2): 257-279.
  42. Kester, W. C. (1981). Growth options and investment: A dynamic perspective on the firm’s allocation of resources. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  43. Kester, W. C. (1984). Today’s options for tomorrow’s growth. Harvard Business Review 62 (2): 153-160.
  44. Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  45. Kor, Y. Y., and Mahoney, J. T. (2000). Penrose’s resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity. Journal of Management Studies 37 (1): 109-139.
  46. Lessard, D., Romer, P., Perlman, L., Shih, S., and Volkenia, M. (1998). Bank of America round table on the soft revolution: Achieving growth by managing intangibles. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11 (2): 8-27.
  47. Litschert, R. J., and Bonham, T. W. (1978). A conceptual model of strategy formulation. Academy of Management Review 211-219.
  48. March, J. G. and Simon, H. (1958). Organizations (reprinted in 1993 (2nd ed) ed.). New York: Wiley.
  49. Marino, K. E., Casataldi, R. M., and Dollinger, M. J. (1989). Content analysis in entrepreneurship research: The case of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 14 (1): 51-66.
  50. McDougall, P. P., Covin, J. G., Robinson, R. B., Jr., and Herron, L. (1994). The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management Journal 15: 537-554.
  51. McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review 24 (1): 13-30.
  52. McGrath, R. G., and MacMillan, I. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  53. Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to organizational jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 515-537.
  54. Miller, D. (1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review 18 (1): 116-138.
  55. Miller, A. and Camp, B. (1985). Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 1 (1): 87-105.
  56. Miller, K. D., and Leiblein, M. J. (1996). Corporate risk-return relations: Returns variability versus downside risk. Academy of Management Journal 39 (1): 91-122.
  57. Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business 34: 411-433.
  58. Morris, M. H. (1998). Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantage for individuals, organizations, and societies. Westport, CT: Quorum.
  59. Mosakowski, E. (1991). Organizational boundaries and economic performance: An empirical study of entrepreneurial computer firms. Strategic Management Journal 12: 115-134.
  60. Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., and Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research 36 (1): 15-23.
  61. Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5 (2): 147-175.
  62. Neck, H. M., Welbourne, T. M., and Meyer, G. D. (2000). Competing on knowledge: Young high-technology intial public offerings build for growth. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
  63. Nohria, N. and Gulati, R. (1995). What is the optimum amount of organizational slack? A study of the relationship between slack and innovation in multinational firms. Academy of Management Proceedings: 32-36.
  64. Pagano, M., Panetta, F., and Zingales, L. (1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance 53 (1): 27-64.
  65. Penrose, E. (1955). Limits to the growth and size of firms. American Economic Review 45: 531-543.
  66. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
  67. Penrose, E. (1985). The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Oeconomiae Negotiorum 20 (1): 1-16.
  68. Robinson, C. B. (1998). An examination of the influences of industry structure on eight alternative measures of new venture performance for high potential independent new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 14: 165-187.
  69. Schendel, D. (1995). Strategy futures: What’s left to worry about? Advances in Strategic Management 11B: 143-188.
  70. Schumpeter, J. (1934). Theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  71. Sexton, D. L. and Smilor, R. W. (Eds.). (1997). Entrepreneurship 2000. Chicago: Upstart Publishing.
  72. Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal 29 (3): 562-585.
  73. Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B., and Tansik, D. A. (1988). Antecedents of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review 13 (4): 601-614.
  74. Starbuck, W. H. (1965). Organizational growth and development. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations: 451-533. Chicago: McNally.
  75. Stinchombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations: 142-193. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
  76. Trigeorgis, L. (1993). Real options and interactions with financial flexibility. Financial Management 22 (3): 202-224.
  77. Weinzimmer, L. G. (2000). A replication and extension of organizational growth determinants. Journal of Business Research 48 (4): 35-41.
  78. Welbourne, T. M., and Andrews, A. O. (1996). Predicting the performance of initial public offerings: Should human resource management be in the equation? Academy of Management Journal 39 (4): 891-919.
  79. Welbourne, T. W., Meyer, G. D., and Neck, H. M. (1998). Getting past the entrepreneurial growth ceiling: A longitudinal study of IPO firm growth through solution driven strategies. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: 426-439. CAHRS Working Paper #98-08. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
  80. Wilbon, A. (1999). An empirical investigation of technology strategy in computer software initial public offering firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 16 (2): 147-169.
  81. Williamson, P. J. (1999). Strategy as options on the future. Sloan Management Review 40 (3): 117-126.