Time-span and Time Compression: New Challenges Facing Contemporary Leaders
Copyright (c) 2015 Author & JLM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In his over 50 years of research, Dr. Elliott Jaques discovered that managers operating at successive organizational layers are concerned about events occurring further and further out into the future. As a result of this effort, Jaques developed a measuring instrument he called time-span. Time-span was intended to discover the maximum amount of time a manager requires a subordinate to work on his own account. He subsequently developed a useful heuristic that identified the appropriate time-span, (e.g., the level of work) for each successive organizational layer in a properly structured organization. Jaques and his Associates utilized the time-span instrument in a series of research studies conducted on various U.S. Army Headquarters Organizations. The researchers found that many staff members were operating at too low a level. This resulted in some of the more longer-term work not getting done. In a unique follow-on study involving military individuals who operated in both wartime situations and peacetime ones, Clement found that the time-span instrument did not always accurately predict level of work. It was discovered that many individuals in the wartime environment experienced time-compression. These individuals focused on much shorter time related issues. A seminal conclusion from this research effort was that the time-span measure sometimes had to be modified due to the unique characteristics of vastly different work situations, e.g., wartime, severe financial conditions, rapid changes in technology, etc. This modification was referred to as the time-compression phenomenon.
- Clement, S., D., and Ch. R. Clement (2013). It’s all about work: organizing your company to get work done. The Woodlands, TX: Organizational Design.
- Clement, S., D. (2002). CIO/G-6 Headquarters Department of the Army Realignment Transition Plan, HQDA, Washington, D.C.: The Pentagon.
- Clement, S., D. (2009). The Army CIO/G-6 Work Analysis Study”, HQDA, Washington, D.C.: The Pentagon.
- Ivanov, S. (2009). Organizational Study of the U.S. Department of the Army, www.SergeyIvanov.org: [unpublished manusctipt, under copyright].
- Ivanov, S. (2011). Why Organizations Fail: A Conversation About American Competitiveness. International Journal of Organizational Innovation 4 (94): 110-116.
- Ivanov, S. (2013). Defects in Modern Organizations: Field Findings and Discovery. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology 4 (2): 204-208.
- Jaques, E. (1976). A General Theory of Bureaucracy. London: Heinemann.
- Jaques, E. (1964). Time-Span Handbook. London: Heinemann.
- Raynor, M., E. (2007). The Strategy Paradox. New York: Doubleday.